Publications
Publications
Study on the Effectiveness of the Corruption Proofing Mechanism in 2012
February 2013The Study on the effectiveness of corruption mechanism in 2012 was made by the Centre for the Analysis and Preventing Corruption (CAPC) within the Project “Corruption proofing – phase V”, financial supported by the Civil Rights Defenders from Sweden aimed at analyzing the effectiveness of identification process of legal provisions likely to facilitate corruption acts. The study assesses the extent to which Parliament took into account the observations and recommendations of CAPC to avoid inclusion of corruption elements in laws passed.
During January 2, 2012 - January 31, 2013 CAPC analyzed 55 draft legislative acts placed on the website of Parliament and 10 draft legislative acts at express request of Ministry of Justice, Ombudsman Institution and National Commission for Integrity submitted to identify the provisions likely to facilitate the acts of corruption. The efficiency of the corruption proofing reports, prepared by the CAPC experts, was assessed in terms of the extent the 425 objections relating to the specific corruptibility elements, identified in the 14 draft legislative acts, adopted by the Parliament and published in the Official Gazette of the Republic of Moldova at the date of writing this Study. 217 objections of 425 were accepted, which represents an efficiency coefficient of 51.1% of the corruption proofing reports.
This publication is available in Romanian and EnglishGuide to perform vulnerability expertise of drafts normative acts in terms of human rights and gender equality
January 2013The Guide to perform vulnerability expertise of drafts normative acts in terms of human rights and gender equality represents a first step in creating a set of minimum standards applicable to the conceptualization, elaboration and promotion process of drafts normative acts and which will contribute to: ensure compliance of legal norms to the national and international human rights standards, including gender equality; prevent the vulnerability factors’ appearance and/or identification, which violates/limits/ignores or could violate/limit/ignore human rights/gender equality and to prevent or diminish their possible negative effects; prevent the Republic of Moldova condemnation to the European Court of Human Rights.
Vulnerability expertise of drafts normative acts in terms of human rights and gender equality, according to the Guide, could be carry out both concerning basic drafts normative acts, as well as on drafts normative acts on amending, completing and repealing. The Guide can be also applied in the expertise process of normative acts in force.
It could become a guideline for public authorities’ representatives in the process of normative acts’ elaboration and adoption in line with international standards on human rights protections, including on gender equality.
This publication is available in Romanian and EnglishStudy on effectiveness of the corruption proofing mechanism in 2011
January 2012
The Study on the effectiveness of corruption mechanism in 2011 was made by the Centre for the Analysis and Preventing Corruption (CAPC) within the Project “Corruption proofing – phase V”, financial supported by the Civil Rights Defenders from Sweden and Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA) aimed at analyzing the effectiveness of identification process of legal provisions likely to facilitate corruption acts. The study assesses the extent to which Parliament took into account the observations and recommendations of CAPC to avoid inclusion of corruption elements in laws passed.
During January 1, 2011 - December 31, 2011 CAPC analyzed 70 draft legislative acts placed on the website of Parliament and 1 draft legislative act at express request of Ministry of Justice submitted to identify the provisions likely to facilitate the acts of corruption. The efficiency of the corruption proofing reports, prepared by the CAPC experts, was assessed in terms of the extent the 342 objections relating to the specific corruptibility elements, identified in the 19 drafts that the Parliament accepted or were retained by authors. 186 objections of 342 were accepted, which represents an efficiency coefficient of 54.4% of the corruption proofing reports.
